The EU packaging regulation for exporters has applied since 12 August 2026, and the number you have probably seen quoted about it is wrong on both counts. "Your e-commerce boxes can only be 40% empty from August 2026" was repeated across supplier newsletters and LinkedIn posts for a year. The regulation says 50%, and it says 1 January 2030. What actually landed on 12 August 2026 is paperwork, not box dimensions — and that distinction decides whether you redesign cartons you never needed to redesign.
This is a timeline, not a legal opinion. Dates and article numbers are cited to the regulation and to published legal analysis so you can check them yourself.
The application date has now passed, and the Commission was explicit about what came with it. Announcing the change on 12 August 2026, it named the PFAS restriction on food-contact packaging as the measure entering into application that day, and put everything dimensional in a later bracket: "concrete measures to reduce the generation of packaging waste, such as new limits on empty space, restrictions on certain single-use plastic packaging or reuse targets, will apply as of 2030." That single sentence settles the argument the rest of this article was written to settle.
What the PPWR is, in one sentence
The Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation — Regulation (EU) 2025/40, usually shortened to PPWR — is the EU law that governs how packaging entering the EU market must be designed, labelled, documented and recovered; it entered into force on 11 February 2025, applies from 12 August 2026, and replaces the old Packaging Directive 94/62/EC.
The word "Regulation" is the part exporters miss. A Directive had to be transposed into 27 national laws, which is why packaging rules used to differ between Germany and France. A Regulation applies directly and identically in every Member State. One rulebook, no transposition, no national variation to hide in.
The timeline: what applies when
| Date | What starts | Affects you if |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Feb 2025 | PPWR entered into force | Nothing operational yet |
| 25 Feb 2026 | Commission decision exempting pallet wrappings and straps from the 100% intra-company reuse requirement | You palletise — but note this is a reuse-target carve-out, not an Article 24 one |
| 30 Mar 2026 | Commission publishes its PPWR guidance document, C(2026) 3702, plus an FAQ | You need an official reading rather than a consultancy's |
| 12 Aug 2026 | Regulation applied; Directive 94/62/EC repealed. Producer registration (EPR), conformity assessment and declaration of conformity duties, importer and authorised-representative obligations, substance restrictions (heavy metals, PFAS in food-contact packaging) | You ship anything packaged into the EU |
| 12 Aug 2028 | Harmonised labelling: material-composition and sorting pictograms on packaging, matched to bin labels | You print or specify packaging artwork |
| 1 Jan 2030 | Design-for-recyclability grades; minimum recycled content in plastic packaging; empty space ratio max 50% for grouped, transport and e-commerce packaging (Art. 24); packaging minimisation duty (Art. 10); Annex V single-use bans | You ship in cartons, mailers or grouped packs |
| 12 Feb 2028 | Deadline for the implementing act fixing the empty space ratio calculation methodology | You want a defensible void-space number rather than an interpretation |
| 1 Jan 2035 | Packaging must be recyclable "at scale" | Long-range design decisions |
| 1 Jan 2038 | Only recyclability grades A and B permitted | Long-range design decisions |
| 1 Jan 2040 | Higher recycled-content thresholds | Long-range design decisions |
| 12 Feb 2032 | Commission review of whether the 50% empty space limit should be tightened | Treat 50% as a floor, not a permanent ceiling |
Read that table once more with an export planner's eye. Everything dimensional — void space, minimisation, right-sizing — sits in the 2030 column. Everything administrative sits in the 2026 column. Most of the panic has been aimed at the wrong column.
What actually changed on 12 August 2026 — and is now live
You have to be registered before you sell
Producers must be entered in the national producer register of each Member State where they first make packaged goods available, and report the packaging types and quantities they place on that market. No registration, no legal sale. For a Chinese or Vietnamese supplier selling DDP or through a warehouse in the EU, this is the obligation most likely to stop a shipment, and it is not something your freight forwarder handles by default.
Somebody in the EU has to be answerable
A non-EU manufacturer does not get to be invisible. The obligations land on whoever places the packaging on the EU market — your importer, your EU subsidiary, or an authorised representative you appoint. If your contract says "FOB, buyer handles compliance," confirm in writing that your buyer accepts the producer role. Assumed compliance is the failure mode here: both sides think the other one registered.
The declaration of conformity becomes a real document
Manufacturers must run a conformity assessment against the applicable requirements and draw up a written EU declaration of conformity, with supporting technical documentation retained for years afterwards. In practice your EU customer will ask you, the supplier, for the underlying data on your packaging — material, weight, composition, recycled content where claimed. Suppliers who cannot produce it get replaced by suppliers who can.
The scope phases in: the conformity assessment initially covers the substance restrictions that apply from 2026, and widens as later articles switch on. So the current version of this document is narrower than the 2030 version. If you have not opened the file yet, do it now — the duties are already in force, and you will only be adding rows to it later.
Substance limits bite immediately
The sum of lead, cadmium, mercury and hexavalent chromium in packaging is capped at 100 mg/kg, and PFAS in food-contact packaging is restricted. Inks, coatings, metallised films and printed tapes are where this shows up in practice, and those are decided by your packaging vendor, not by you. Ask them for it in writing now.
The empty-space rule everyone quotes wrong
Here is the claim, stated correctly: Article 24 of the PPWR sets a maximum empty space ratio of 50% for grouped packaging, transport packaging and e-commerce packaging, and that limit applies from 1 January 2030. Void fill — air cushions, bubble wrap, foam, crumpled paper — counts as empty space, not as product. Two exemptions matter: sales packaging used directly as e-commerce packaging with no outer box, and reusable packaging inside a certified reuse system.
Two things are widely misreported. The threshold is 50%, not 40%. And the date is 2030, not 2026. The separate duty in Article 10 to reduce packaging weight and volume to the minimum needed for functionality carries the same 1 January 2030 date, assessed against the performance criteria in Annex IV and justified in the technical documentation — several consultancies have written 2026 for it, and they are wrong.
The Commission has since closed the gap between the two articles itself. Its guidance document of 30 March 2026, C(2026) 3702, devotes a section to the relationship between Article 10 minimisation and the Article 24 empty space ratio, and the distinction it draws is the one to carry into a customer conversation: Article 10 minimisation has no predefined threshold and is judged case by case; Article 24 is a hard 50% ceiling on grouped, transport and e-commerce packaging. Sales packaging is argued. Your shipper is measured.
Be precise about what counts as void, because this is where suppliers talk past their buyers. Paper cuttings, air cushions, bubble wrap, sponge and foam fillers, wood wool, polystyrene and polystyrene chips are all scored as empty space rather than as content. You cannot cushion your way under the cap — filler leaves the box the same size, so it moves the ratio in the wrong direction. The compliant answer to fragile goods is a smaller cavity, not a softer one.
One thing genuinely remains undecided: the Commission has yet to issue the implementing act that fixes the calculation methodology, and its deadline for doing so is 12 February 2028. The arithmetic everyone is working from — (packaging volume − product volume) ÷ packaging volume — is the sensible reading, but the official method, and how it treats irregular shapes and multi-item packs, is still to come. Anyone selling you a certified void-space number today is selling you their interpretation. The worked arithmetic, the two exemptions and the confusion with the pallet-wrap decision are unpacked SKU by SKU in the empty space ratio breakdown.
That pallet-wrap decision is worth naming, because it is the most-miscited carve-out in this regulation. On 25 February 2026 the Commission exempted pallet wrappings and straps from the 100% intra-company reuse requirement. That is a reuse target. It is a different article with a different obligation, and it does nothing to Article 24. If a supplier tells you palletised transport packaging is out of scope for void space, ask which article they are reading.
What this means for your cartons and your spec sheet
The dimensional requirements are still more than three years out, which is roughly one packaging redesign cycle. That is not "ignore it." It is "fold it into the next redesign instead of running an emergency one." The same measurement discipline applies further up the pack — see wooden crate dimensions for export for how outer size, clearance and skid height decide pallet and container fit.
The practical bottleneck is data quality, and this is where most suppliers are further behind than they think. To calculate a void ratio you need the true internal dimensions of the carton and the true outer dimensions of the product, not the rounded numbers on the old spec sheet. Most catalogues carry a product size that was measured once, by someone who has left, to the nearest centimetre, and a carton size that is actually the external dimension. Those two numbers cannot produce a defensible ratio.
Fixing that is the same discipline as master carton dimensions for export: measure it, state which measurement it is, and publish it where the buyer and the compliance file both read from the same figure. Getting the labelling side right follows the same logic as export carton shipping marks — the box has to carry the information legibly, in the right place, in a form somebody downstream can act on.
The capability that closes the gap is unglamorous: measure the real product and the real carton, lock those measured dimensions onto the catalogue image and the spec sheet where buyers actually look, and export the same figures to the compliance file. Snap-to-edge measurement on a photo of the actual item beats a number retyped from a 2019 quotation, and it beats an AI-generated visual that produces a plausible-looking dimension it never measured. For packaging compliance the difference is not cosmetic — a wrong dimension in a declaration is a wrong declaration.
Post-application compliance check
The duties below are live, not upcoming — run this as a check, not a countdown.
- Confirm, per EU market you sell into, who is the registered producer — you, your importer, or an appointed authorised representative
- Get that registration confirmed in writing, not assumed from an Incoterm
- Request a materials declaration from every packaging vendor: substrate, inks, coatings, adhesives, heavy-metal and PFAS status
- Confirm the technical documentation file is open and current, even if it holds only the substance data
- Re-measure your top 20 SKUs: true product outer dimensions and true carton internal dimensions, in mm
- Record which figure is which on the spec sheet — "internal" vs "external" written out, not implied
- Diary the artwork deadline for August 2028 labelling into your next packaging print run, not the one after
- Note 1 Jan 2030 against your next carton redesign, with the 50% void ratio as a design input
Next steps
Three options, depending on how exposed you are:
- Low exposure (you sell FOB, buyer is the EU importer). Confirm the producer role in writing and supply the packaging materials data your buyer requests. Cost: a few emails.
- Medium exposure (DDP, EU warehouse, or your own EU entity). You are likely the producer. Registration and the conformity file are yours. Budget for a compliance consultant in each Member State where you hold stock.
- Any exposure at all. Re-measure the SKUs and fix the spec sheet, because every later obligation is computed from those numbers. Doing this with measured dimensions marked directly on the product images — rather than as a spreadsheet nobody trusts — means the buyer-facing catalogue and the compliance file stop disagreeing. Purpose-built dimension and spec annotation software makes this a per-SKU task of minutes; the alternative is a designer redrawing arrows in a generic image editor and introducing a new rounding error each time.
The cost of getting this wrong is not only a fine. A shipment refused at the border, repacked and re-labelled, carries freight, storage, rework and a late delivery your customer remembers. If you want that number for your own volumes, run it through the return cost calculator — rejected export shipments and consumer returns have the same cost structure, and both start with a number on a document that did not match the goods.
FAQ
When does the EU packaging regulation apply?
The PPWR, Regulation (EU) 2025/40, has applied since 12 August 2026. It entered into force on 11 February 2025 and repealed Packaging Directive 94/62/EC on the application date. Later obligations phase in on 12 August 2028 (harmonised labelling) and 1 January 2030 (recyclability grades, recycled content, empty space ratio, minimisation).
Does PPWR apply to manufacturers outside the EU?
Yes, indirectly but unavoidably. The regulation binds whoever places packaging on the EU market. If that is your importer, they carry the registration and conformity duties — and will pass the data requests to you. If you sell DDP, hold stock in an EU warehouse, or operate an EU entity, you are likely the producer yourself and may need an authorised representative established in the EU.
What is the PPWR empty space ratio, and when does it start?
Article 24 caps the empty space ratio at 50% for grouped, transport and e-commerce packaging, applying from 1 January 2030 — not 40%, and not 2026. Void fill such as bubble wrap, air cushions and foam counts toward the empty space, not toward the product. Sales packaging shipped without an outer box, and reusable packaging in a certified reuse system, are exempt.
Do I need an EU declaration of conformity for packaging?
Yes. Since 12 August 2026 the manufacturer must carry out the conformity assessment and draw up a written EU declaration of conformity, backed by technical documentation retained for several years. The scope starts with the requirements applicable in 2026 and widens as later articles apply. In practice EU buyers are already asking suppliers for the underlying packaging data, so treat the request as live rather than upcoming.
How do I calculate the void space ratio for my carton?
The working formula is (internal packaging volume − product volume) ÷ internal packaging volume, expressed as a percentage, with void fill counted as empty space. The official calculation methodology is still to be set by a Commission implementing act, so treat any current figure as provisional. What you can do now is make the inputs trustworthy: measure the product's true outer dimensions and the carton's true internal dimensions in millimetres, and label each clearly on the spec sheet so nobody substitutes an external carton dimension for an internal one.
Has the European Commission published official guidance on the PPWR?
Yes. On 30 March 2026 the Commission published a guidance document, Commission Notice C(2026) 3702, together with a set of frequently asked questions, to support consistent application of Regulation (EU) 2025/40 across Member States. Neither replaces, adds to or amends the regulation itself, but between them they give an official reading of contested points — including the relationship between the Article 10 minimisation duty and the Article 24 empty space ratio. Cite the guidance rather than a consultancy summary when a customer disputes a date.
Does PPWR replace national packaging laws like Germany's VerpackG?
Largely, yes. As a Regulation it applies directly in all Member States without transposition, which is the point of moving away from a Directive. Member States are still adapting national implementing legislation for registers, enforcement and fees — Germany's VerpackDG process is the visible example — so national registration mechanics will continue to differ even though the substantive rules converge.
Sources & References
- Regulation (EU) 2025/40 on packaging and packaging waste (PPWR) — EUR-Lex canonical text
- European Commission — Packaging waste policy overview
- European Commission — New EU rules on packaging enter into application (12 August 2026; confirms limits on empty space apply as of 2030)
- European Commission — Commission Notice, guidance document for Regulation (EU) 2025/40, C(2026) 3702 (30 March 2026)
- EU Publications Office — Frequently asked questions on the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation
- European Commission — Pallet wrapping and straps exempt from 100% reuse requirement (decision of 25 February 2026)
- Keller and Heckman — The New EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation: Highlights and Challenges Ahead
- Latham & Watkins — European Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation: Summary of Provisions and New Guidance
- Gleiss Lutz — The new EU Packaging Regulation: key requirements from August 2026
- Circularise — PPWR guide to compliance timelines
- Coolset — Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation essentials
- Compliance Gate — EU Packaging Regulation (PPWR) timeline: 2026 to 2040
- business.gov.uk — EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation guidance for exporters
- Ecosistant — EU packaging regulation 2025/40: what it means for e-commerce
