
WLL vs MBL: 6 Labels That Get Slings Rejected
WLL vs MBL differ by a design factor of 2:1 to 7:1, so the wrong label overstates capacity by a multiple. Six rejected patterns and what to write instead.
Browse b2b & suppliers articles on SizeMarker Blog

WLL vs MBL differ by a design factor of 2:1 to 7:1, so the wrong label overstates capacity by a multiple. Six rejected patterns and what to write instead.

NPT vs BSP thread runs 14 TPI in both at 1/2 in, so it assembles and then leaks. TPI and major-diameter tables, plus an eight-field callout template.

Mesh count vs micron: mesh is a weave density, not an aperture. Two 100-mesh cloths can differ by 51 microns and both be honestly labelled.

Shore A vs Shore D hardness are two instruments, not two precisions: why 'Shore 70' is not a spec, why no conversion exists, and how to write a callout that holds.

Ra vs Rz measure different things — two parts can share an Ra and only one will seal. What each parameter sees, why no conversion factor works, and what ISO 21920 changed.

Cover width vs overall width decides panel count: a 1,000 mm sheet covers 840 mm. The profile table, the panel-count formula and where the 25% shortfall comes from.

What bearing numbers mean: 6205 decodes to a 25 mm bore, 52 mm OD and 15 mm width under ISO 15. Bore-code table, dimension series, suffixes and what to quote.

Sheet metal gauge to mm depends on the metal: 16 gauge is 1.52 mm in steel, 1.61 mm galvanized, 1.59 mm stainless, 1.29 mm aluminium. Four tables compared.

Wood moisture content for export furniture decides whether a table lands flat or cracked. Six questions answered with real EMC numbers by destination market.

R-value vs U-value vs lambda explained for exporters: what each number measures, the metric-imperial trap, and how to quote insulation specs buyers trust.

Appliance cutout dimensions are the opening an appliance needs, not its own size. Eight questions export cabinet catalogs must answer before shipping.

How to communicate product dimensions to buyers: four methods — email spec, technical drawing, plain photo, annotated photo — compared on comprehension and error risk.